I am reading the Roy Moore decision. What a day.
-
-
These are Alabama judges, unanimously ruling against Moore (although one didn't join the opinion). https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/roy-moores-suspension-as-alabamas-chief-justice-is-upheld?utm_term=.kw0rRLzGVx#.alaMlgBXLa …pic.twitter.com/WXfNVz6JoU
-
Note: Ct also ruled on Moore's claim that suspension pending trial on ethics charges violates due process—bc other judges will face charges.pic.twitter.com/2jO1JfXMC6
-
Is it accurate to call the decision unanimous, or does the "concurs in result" make that not true? But, no dissents - or is THAT a dissent?
-
It's a unanimous decision. The opinion is not from all justices, but the final justice concurs in the result — meaning agrees with it.
-
He might not agree w all the language, but he agrees with the decision of the court—affirming the Court of the Judiciary "in all respects."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
really appreciate seeing these tweets. We need the reporting on this more than ever. Thanks Chris, I follow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roy Moore's Suspension As Alabama's Chief Justice Is Upheld By Alabama Supreme Court Moore. No more. Suspension to run for length of term.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And now he will run for us senate or governor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.