#SCOTUS, April 17, 2017. Gorsuch, J., entering.pic.twitter.com/bPnIh9nmv2
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Well ... didn't want the current court to hear the case. Which is a very different thing than what you assert here.
Because they didn't want another pro-immigrant justice hearing the case?http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/21/neil-gorsuchs-rulings-come-under-the-microscope/ …
Granting cert is a vote-counting measure. I'm not sure what your aim is here, but it appears that it's just some partisan thing, so be well.
My aim was to have a wrong righted, but unfortunately #SCOTUS took a pass.
I'm talking about in this weird Twitter thread.
I was voicing frustration that SCOTUS didn't grant cert in Castro v. DHS, the Berks baby jail case.http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/castro-v-department-homeland-security/ …
I tweeted about the cert denial later in the thread you were replying to, first of all. Second, your tweet makes assumptions about the ...
... justices and their votes for or against cert that ignore why justices vote for or against cert.
Didn't read the entire thread... and bottom line is Cert wasn't granted on a case that needed to be heard by a full Court.
Can you explain this further?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.