McCaskill sounds pretty solidly NO on Gorsuch, but also NO on filibuster. http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article141651189.html …pic.twitter.com/px8c7PgvcJ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Real problem - Dems always insist it's about getting someone who "shares our values" rather than someone who applies the law.
And conservatives want someone who will faithfully apply current law like Roe v Wade?
Conservatives generally respect precedent. But sometimes it should be overruled. Like Plessy v Ferguson.
would love to hear more about Justice Thomas respecting precedent
She's wrong.
Backfire it could by the simple fact that Judge Gorsuch has the top rating from the ABA and many supporters are reviewing some 2800 cases.
Supreme Court Justices have never been filibustered, but what they did to justice Clarence Thomas was much worse and frankly disgusting.
It was a wise analysis from Senator McCaskill
No McCaskill is worried about herself.
You know @clairecmc is just worried about her set. Its time for Missouri to bring her home. Maybe she can be the president of UofMozzo.
She ought to be afraid. Has she done any town halls or is she chicken? She needs to retire.
Might be the only smart thing she's ever said!
Look out Schumer will go off on you, it does it to ladies who don't think the way he does.
now that the Republicans leaked the tape & are using it, she will get even more pressure to filibuster to not enable them ... tricky tricky
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.