2nd Cir panel declines to overrule prior cases finding sexual orientation claims aren't allowed under Title VII. http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98aa3ff8-d4b2-4b1d-b804-05347ae69d4c/1/doc/16-748_complete_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98aa3ff8-d4b2-4b1d-b804-05347ae69d4c/1/hilite/ …
-
-
Notably, two members of the three-judge panel urge the 2nd Circuit to revisit the issue, including Chief Judge Katzmann.pic.twitter.com/L6Pk8wScqn
-
tl;dr: 2nd Cir, like the 11th Cir (and 7th Cir before it), is stuck with old anti-sex orientation claim decisions, unless it goes en banc.
-
Here's the 11th Circuit version: http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201515234.pdf …pic.twitter.com/IWLMfIPrUd
-
Here was the 7th Circuit version — https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-appeals-court-rejects-protections-for-gay-people-und?utm_term=.lv0qE4dKPe#.aw8Wkq4jKa … — and en banc grant:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/full-federal-appeals-court-to-reconsider-case-on-gay-protect?utm_term=.tmbp8Kbj56#.lrqNqW0e4j …
-
That case was heard at the end of November, so we're just waiting on a decision in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College (15-1720).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.