Nonetheless, 2nd Cir holds plaintiff ~can~ press case of gender stereotyping, sending case back to the trial court. http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98aa3ff8-d4b2-4b1d-b804-05347ae69d4c/1/doc/16-748_complete_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98aa3ff8-d4b2-4b1d-b804-05347ae69d4c/1/hilite/ …
-
-
-
From the per curiam decision of the 2nd Circuit:pic.twitter.com/X1oOPMvulR
-
Notably, two members of the three-judge panel urge the 2nd Circuit to revisit the issue, including Chief Judge Katzmann.pic.twitter.com/L6Pk8wScqn
-
tl;dr: 2nd Cir, like the 11th Cir (and 7th Cir before it), is stuck with old anti-sex orientation claim decisions, unless it goes en banc.
-
Here's the 11th Circuit version: http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201515234.pdf …pic.twitter.com/IWLMfIPrUd
-
Here was the 7th Circuit version — https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-appeals-court-rejects-protections-for-gay-people-und?utm_term=.lv0qE4dKPe#.aw8Wkq4jKa … — and en banc grant:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/full-federal-appeals-court-to-reconsider-case-on-gay-protect?utm_term=.tmbp8Kbj56#.lrqNqW0e4j …
-
That case was heard at the end of November, so we're just waiting on a decision in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College (15-1720).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
would be interesting to see CA2 go en banc as other circuits (eg CA11 as you point out) continue to use Simonton for support
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.