JUST IN —> Justice Department Defends Trump’s Travel Ban At The Fourth Circuit And In The Hawaii Case:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/justice-department-defends-trumps-travel-ban-at-appeals?utm_term=.shvdbJGr3n …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The Trump administration, in the midst of its healthcare bill failure, was busy in court defending its travel ban:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/justice-department-defends-trumps-travel-ban-at-appeals?utm_term=.xl301JxZop#.iqODOydq2z …
7 replies 81 retweets 90 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
DOJ skates on some thiiiiiin ice here in the Fourth Circuit merits brief.pic.twitter.com/YIw7M8eyoZ
15 replies 73 retweets 134 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Also, further down into this section: I imagine there are many people who wouldn't mind this coming to pass at all.pic.twitter.com/ZDwcxOYuWV
1 reply 24 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
It's also, obviously, a much further-down-the-stream argument than the argument actually being advanced by plaintiffs in these cases.
2 replies 5 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The idea that "express statements of discriminatory intent" = "a candidate’s religiously related campaign statements" is an argument, but.
2 replies 4 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
and at no point (that I know of) did Trump say ban was motivated by *his* religion (snort); merely animus toward another.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Whole argument is a red herring; rests on (false) implication that hatred of a religion is itself inherently religious view
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.