Well, not really. @ChuckGrassley Not if he'd been nominated by a president who wasn't under investigation for treason...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Couldn't the same be said about Garland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@chrisgeidner He meant to say "Judge Garland."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
flagrant denial of what they did to president obama is really irritating.. i think they all need their smirking asses kicked.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty sure they wouldn't filibuster Merrick Garland!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what? Its exactly what they did. Remind him Garland never even got a hearing, so which is worse?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anybody—meaning Gorsuch and Gorsuch and Gorsuch?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty sure they won't filibuster Garland
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody seems to remember that Garland was already a compromise-nominee.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and Garland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a feeling they wouldn't currently filibuster Merrick Garland...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It amazes me how one side can just forget the past year...
#GarlandNotGorsuchThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Says the guy who single handedly prevented Merrick Garland from getting hearing.
@chrisgeidnerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.