After Graham gave his whole "we should be better" speech, Leahy notes that Graham only mentioned Obama having 2 — not 3 — SCOTUS nominees.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah. I know it's hard to swallow. The whole whining about Garner and media hailing it is a big bust. Get over it.
-
What relevance does any person named "Garner" have to any part of this argument?
-
Ok, so you're too dumb to realize I meant Garland?
-
Resort to personal insult is indicative of a lack of support for one's argument
-
Yes, keep ignoring the point. Every time Garland is brought up in hearings, you should cringe. Instead, u all cheer. Pathetic.
-
You said Garland was never before Congress. I said simply as my only point that Obama put his name before the Senate
#FactsMatter -
Did he come b4 Congress? Their right not to bring him in and they used that right. Elections have consequences as someone said.
-
This response is unrelated to the simple factual error my comments sought to correct
#FactsMatter - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.