... "not all cases are particularly divisive" is very true.
-
-
... what the court actually does. Those things are true and do matter to an understanding of the ups and downs of nominations!
-
point very well taken, but my acknowledging the "is" does not preclude my championing the "ought." And you know I do both.
-
my meta-point in our back-and-forth here: please be more charitable, especially when you have reason to be.
-
it makes the resulting exchange, like the one we're having, much more effective when it starts with expectation of good faith.
-
I think your statement is wrong. I don't think it's any statement of "bad faith" in my disagreeing with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.