This is completely untrue, setting up a false choice.https://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/843903459699179521 …
If you actually think that, we disagree on the "all the things" point.
-
-
maybe *your* headlines because you admirably report on all the things that should matter. I'm talking undisputed blockbusters.
-
Abortion, religion, guns, LGBT, voting rights, campaign finance, arbitration (yes, arbitration!).
-
sure, there are cases here and there in those categories (oh, affirmative action, too!) that aren't 5-4 ideological splits.
-
but those issues are shorthand for the 5-4 cases that make
#SCOTUS the storm center of US politics every June and conf hearing -
Right, but I think pretending that those are the only issues — from someone like you — is hurtful to good discussion of ...
-
... what the court actually does. Those things are true and do matter to an understanding of the ups and downs of nominations!
-
point very well taken, but my acknowledging the "is" does not preclude my championing the "ought." And you know I do both.
-
my meta-point in our back-and-forth here: please be more charitable, especially when you have reason to be.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.