This is completely untrue, setting up a false choice.https://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/843903459699179521 …
-
-
As to why it sets up a false choice, it can both be true that most cases aren't ideologically divided AND that nominations ...
-
... get political attention that they do because of some key ideological issues and cases. Talking about both is important!
-
Agree again! And Gorsuch is right to point it out. But it's to strategically to minimize his future votes that will line up.
-
and on that, I call "canard." He's saying "look, forget that I'll vote one way on all the things that make headlines."
-
If you actually think that, we disagree on the "all the things" point.
-
maybe *your* headlines because you admirably report on all the things that should matter. I'm talking undisputed blockbusters.
-
Abortion, religion, guns, LGBT, voting rights, campaign finance, arbitration (yes, arbitration!).
-
sure, there are cases here and there in those categories (oh, affirmative action, too!) that aren't 5-4 ideological splits.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes! agree! but that's not why these hearings are such fights. Or why people (when they care) go to polls based on SCOTUS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.