pray tell. And please, let's be good to each other in doing so.
-
-
-
and in expectation of good faith & reasonable intelligence that should govern, here's a clarifier:https://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/843904908957044738 …
-
I mean, that totally changes what you said.
-
I also think — particularly when it comes to (1) new technology; (2) criminal procedure; & (3) executive authority — that ...
-
... "not all cases are particularly divisive" is very true.
-
As to why it sets up a false choice, it can both be true that most cases aren't ideologically divided AND that nominations ...
-
... get political attention that they do because of some key ideological issues and cases. Talking about both is important!
-
Agree again! And Gorsuch is right to point it out. But it's to strategically to minimize his future votes that will line up.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He's saying neither of those things is true, which is absolutely correct historically. What's the untruth?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.