Finally, did you see? Sessions Says His Original Senate Testimony Was "Correct" In Letter Adding To That Testimony https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/sessions-adds-to-his-senate-testimony-in-a-letter-acknowledg?utm_term=.fnXJZ34mR …
-
-
Does perjury (lying under oath) require explicitly provable intent? That would seem to be an arbitrary and insurmountable bar
-
Perjury, in fact, does require proof of intent. https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1747-elements-perjury-specific-intent …
-
it's generally not something that is prosecuted unless it's really flagrant. So Sessions has to say he meant to be truthful?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He is asking for us to allow him the narrowest possible reading of oral testimony AND to disregard written testimony.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.