He has to claim that. Otherwise he actually gets done on the perjury bit.
-
-
-
Well, no. That's not how perjury works. A person easily could be wrong and not have committed perjury.
-
Does perjury (lying under oath) require explicitly provable intent? That would seem to be an arbitrary and insurmountable bar
-
Perjury, in fact, does require proof of intent. https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1747-elements-perjury-specific-intent …
-
it's generally not something that is prosecuted unless it's really flagrant. So Sessions has to say he meant to be truthful?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
took quite awhile for him to put that together...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's claiming he gave an answer he didn't give to a question that wasn't asked.Still in disbelief this is the AG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.