If Sessions is not himself the subject of an investigation, @SpeakerRyan says he sees no reason for recusal.
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
.
@chrisgeidner Also doesn't meet the recusal standard set by Reno, Ashcroft, Holder, etc. Plus WSJ said he was/is under FBI scrutiny!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is slightly better than the “has a jury been impaneled?” standard
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SpeakerRyan his a joke


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.