Like, here's the deal. It's not "FAKE NEWS." None of the DOJ/Sessions statements dispute that the two meetings happened.
-
-
-
At most, there are disputes over (1) what Sessions thought about those questions and (2) what he intended by his answers.
-
That goes for the people saying this is "definitely" perjury, too. Perjury is tough to prove, & they're clearly crafting an arg against it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
how to spot fake news 1) open story 2) look at URL 3) does it say http://breitbart.com ? 4) if so, it's garbage 5) close tab
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well, glad that's settled!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Breitbart is always



Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelhayes lol. That confirms it's true.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelhayes Squirming.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IS the epitome of
#FakeNews.... They wouldn't know real news if it walked up and slapped Steve Bannon's face.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What did you expect?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What they claim exonerates him,is exactly what I felt is damning. FRANKEN DID NOT ASK IF HE HAD CONTACT.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.