IN OTHER NEWS ... something I'm noticing about the ban EO litigation ...
-
-
Hence the focus, in the 9th Circuit and elsewhere, on vacating the 9th Circuit ruling.
-
Q: why request that the en banc request be postponed if they're that burnt about the existing order?
-
Because they couldn't get it vacated now. They're hoping they could once a new one is issued.
-
sorry if I'm not following- because unlikely to be successful at en banc, or at SCOTUS? Or are you implying another reason?
-
why couldn't they get it vacated at en banc? B/c new order moots issue? Or because unlikely to succeed on merits of PI appeal?
-
They'd have to win an en banc vote for rehearing first, then hold briefing and maybe arguments, then win a stay ruling. Not likely.
-
On several fronts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yep. There's only so much mileage out of shrugging collective shoulders, rolling eyes, and harrumphing, "But it's the 9th!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My favorite part of the EO. I am thinking of getting a tattoo of it. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.