It would be in conjunction w state service, not federal, and by agreement w govs as to what each state would do.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @gabrielmalor
Indeed, quote was re: "round up" which is a fine enough replacer for "apprehension."
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @mattmfm @gabrielmalor
So, you're only questioning Gabe's saying they wouldn't be "rounding up," but you acknowledge the rest of his crit?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @mattmfm
Matt, you've elided "in relation to" which encompasses many other duties. Would depend on state agreements.
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @gabrielmalor @mattmfm
Yeah, this is my point. It's all dependent on the individual state agreements that would be reached.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @mattmfm
Right. Somehow I don't think Gov. Brown is going to go for it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gabrielmalor @chrisgeidner
Don't disagree! But my tweet was specifically re: 'round up' comment, which is fine in place of 'apprehension.'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattmfm @gabrielmalor
The memo does not say they would be rounding up anyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It says they 1) could be 2) authorized, 3) w agreement from gov, to take actions 4) "in relation to" apprehension.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But it was Gabe's point! The memo doesn't say what the AP says it says!
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @gabrielmalor
It was also to wordsmith whether "round up" could replace "apprehension," which is perfectly reasonable!
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.