NOTE: Ali plaintiffs (another ban EO suit) filed a motion to intervene in Wash. v. Trump at 9th Cir today. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3460431/9th-Ali-Intervention-Motion.pdf …
-
-
It's hard for me to imagine how Justice can fairly respond to this order without laying out its next-step plans ... but we'll see!
-
Well, Justice got a bit more time — til 5p today — to file its status update in that Michigan case.pic.twitter.com/yEAoXVmVMZ
-
And, as
@ZoeTillman notes, new ban EO cases keep proceeding:https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/831171026704855040 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not necessarily. Wash. says d.ct. proceedings superseded by CTA9. Look for joint filing at 3:00 a.m. EST tonight.
-
This was AFTER that, Marty.
-
There was a call Friday evening; DOJ asked for more time. This was Robart amending the order to which you are referring.
-
thanks, Chris
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
3pm PST, not EST
-
(Memorandum is due noon PT.)
-
oops, misread your tweet, sorry!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@JoshMBlackman: Plaintiffs should request an order from CA9 remanding, to do the evidentiary work both DCt and CA9 want.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.