Do tell. Sounds as though you have a different take.https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/830909028922511360 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In California alone, you already had the Knight initiative vote back in 2000. Meanwhile, you had Vermont civil unions already ...
Knight initiative certainly was impt. Prop 8 was reaction to 2004, courts followed. I continue to think CA had outsized role.
As every Californian forever, in everything, will. That doesn't make it so. If anything, I think Prop 8 loss in 2008 was the ...
... key California development that affected the pace of marriage equality.
That's fine, and we can disagree on what was/wasn't a major moment. But I still see the 2004 fight in CA as major milestone.
It mattered, sure. I never said it didn't. But it didn't set things in motion—regardless of what Newsom would like us to believe.
Not to belabor this, but hard for me to believe CA court challenges would've happened if Prop 22 was the only action taken.
I'm not sure what that means? You actually think no one would have challenged CA's marriage ban if there weren't the 04 weddings?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.