This would mean the appeal on the merits would continue at the 9th Circuit (or, ~possibly~ still be before Robart).https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/830174089767690243 …
-
-
DOJ spokesperson, noting the 9th Circuit order, adds only, "The Justice Department is considering its options. We have no further comment."
-
I'm pulling this all together into a story that will be published at BuzzFeed dot com the internet website. Soon. XOXO.
-
Here’s Everything You Need To Know About What Happened On Friday With The Travel Ban: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-what-happened-on-fri?utm_term=.mw14oOk08y …pic.twitter.com/b3DCxZfLFc
-
Hmm. Judge Robart is still not ~quite~ clear as to whether he has any jurisdiction here. Modifies his earlier request ...pic.twitter.com/Bwq49caoeR
-
I didn’t read it that way. He’s just asking if it’s TRO or prelim injunction
-
If it's a PI, it's no longer at the district court.
-
District courts can’t issue PIs?
-
No. Re-read his order. If it's already a PI, it's on appeal before the 9th Circuit. He's done.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Chris, I almost wish you would have a conference call to explain to non-legal people like moi.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lots of AUSA's wishing admin would just enter new EO and moot this, for now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We've really got to give the man credit for the great job he's done growing jobs related to the US legal system.
#MAGAThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will this change anything, or is this a time-wasting ploy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.