This would mean the appeal on the merits would continue at the 9th Circuit (or, ~possibly~ still be before Robart).https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/830174089767690243 …
-
-
This means that the entire appeals court will be voting on whether to reconsider Thursday night's decision. Briefs due by 11a PT Feb. 16.
-
tl;dr: This slows everything down a bit.
-
Now, there will be briefs filed by the parties simply on whether the court should reconsider the ruling.
-
DOJ spokesperson, noting the 9th Circuit order, adds only, "The Justice Department is considering its options. We have no further comment."
-
I'm pulling this all together into a story that will be published at BuzzFeed dot com the internet website. Soon. XOXO.
-
Here’s Everything You Need To Know About What Happened On Friday With The Travel Ban: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-what-happened-on-fri?utm_term=.mw14oOk08y …pic.twitter.com/b3DCxZfLFc
-
Hmm. Judge Robart is still not ~quite~ clear as to whether he has any jurisdiction here. Modifies his earlier request ...pic.twitter.com/Bwq49caoeR
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Tonight everyone has to learn about the phrase en banc
-
ninth circuit en banc is even more fun!
-
I can now confirm that the ninth circuit en banc is really something
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm aware. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I don't understand this at all. Since when do courts spontaneously decide to do a do over??
-
When they may be wrong.
-
trump backs off; lets the court eat there own?
-
Yeah, that's what it looks like.
-
No, any judge on the full 9th Circuit court can call for a rehearing vote. Story:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-what-happened-on-fri?utm_term=.gjGrW5rAg#.uoJeAKeqw …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.