I mean, ~I~ don't disagree with you. But.
-
-
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like
-
This guy doesn't know what he's talking about. There is all kinds of precedent re: campaign statements
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JB_Cox @chrisgeidner and
being used to establish illicit motive. The only thing different is that here it's the President
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JB_Cox @chrisgeidner and
But that's only because since the framework's existed, no Pres has been openly racist. Nothing to do
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're missing my point. I'm saying that it will be argued the graf I cited goes beyond restating law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
I understand your point. I'm disagreeing with it. It didn't go beyond restating law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You clearly don't get my point. I am NOT saying it goes beyond. I'm saying it will be argued—incl. poss ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
... by Justice. That's all.
-
-
I see. My apologies for misunderstanding.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.