I think @Patterico's analysis from the 9th Cir args is ~mostly~ right, but I think Clifton signaled a ~bit~ further.http://www.redstate.com/patterico/2017/02/08/analysis-todays-court-argument-trumps-immigration-order-trump-needs-shut-yap/ …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Do you think Clifton is for upholding the whole ban, or just narrowing its scope (which is what I think)?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
In a Twitter thread? You mean your most recent tweet? If so, I saw that, and thanks for highlighting the post and that quote.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Patterico
Chris Geidner Retweeted Chris Geidner
Chris Geidner added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Ah. No, I missed that. You might be right about that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Patterico
I think he'd ideally limit it, but I'm not sure what he'd do if there are two votes to keep it as is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @Patterico
By the end, Flentje was reading from their last-ditch scenario — in which they were assuming LPRs are already out of the picture.pic.twitter.com/dP79uUfEJK
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
He sounded a little desperate, I thought because of Friedland. Clifton sounded very skeptical of the Est. Clause claim to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Totally agree, with all three of those points.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.