I think @Patterico's analysis from the 9th Cir args is ~mostly~ right, but I think Clifton signaled a ~bit~ further.http://www.redstate.com/patterico/2017/02/08/analysis-todays-court-argument-trumps-immigration-order-trump-needs-shut-yap/ …
I think he'd ideally limit it, but I'm not sure what he'd do if there are two votes to keep it as is.
-
-
By the end, Flentje was reading from their last-ditch scenario — in which they were assuming LPRs are already out of the picture.pic.twitter.com/dP79uUfEJK
-
He sounded a little desperate, I thought because of Friedland. Clifton sounded very skeptical of the Est. Clause claim to me.
-
Totally agree, with all three of those points.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.