Also: "based on information he had received" is doing a whole lot of v vague work in explaining why DOJ gave a wildly different # last wk.
-
-
SEIU joins in support of Washington and against Trump's ban EO: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/opponents-of-trumps-travel-ban-make-their-case-to-federal-ap …pic.twitter.com/CjbAfuzefW
-
And, we have an amicus brief in support of DOJ, from
@ACLJ: "The Constitution 'is not a suicide pact.'" https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3455400/9th-ACLJ-for-DOJ.pdf …pic.twitter.com/7ENBhEzQ36
-
Sunset in DC, but it's still early over in 9th Circuit-land.pic.twitter.com/QQkkxtdNZP
-
A group of law professors who take no position on the merits file a brief in support of the states' standing here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3455407/9th-Cir-Law-Profs-In-Support-of-Neither-Party.pdf …pic.twitter.com/78Fib14c7W
-
! —> Acting SG Francisco & Acting Asst AG Readler drop off DOJ reply brief "out of an abundance of caution" bc of JonesDay filing an amicus.pic.twitter.com/pNSsrstmwc
-
Those are listed as "Of Counsel", no?
-
Yes. Read through the brief, it's there at the end.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.