So ... what's happening?
Here's the background from @ZoeTillman and me:https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/federal-judge-criticizes-trumps-travel-ban-and-extends-order?utm_term=.tmbp8Kbj56#.dwGlmNo08W …
-
-
The ban EO debate has constitutional aspects—from presidential power to equal protection & due process—but there's also statutory interp!
-
Here's that discussion in Friday's hearing —> https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3450183/Wash-v-Trump-Arguments.pdf …pic.twitter.com/t5Gm3R9df6
-
"The White House counsel has issued 'authoritative guidance,' whatever that means." - Wash SG Noah Purcell, on the LPR "clarification" memo
-
Hive mind: Is there any law review / legal analysis published on the role of WH counsel's office in giving post hoc "clarification" of EOs?
-
No. I mean, actual law review or legal analysis (like, did someone blog about it after, etc.).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.