If so, there's no one from those seven countries outside the US any longer with a valid visa. Meaning, the TRO would not cover anyone.*
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
* = Other than the specific, named plaintiffs in the case (due to other relief in the TRO).
3 replies 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
SO, moving on to the cases WITHOUT a nationwide order ...
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
First up is the case everyone's been asking me about, Aziz v. Trump, the Dulles case.
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Yes, Virginia filed a motion to intervene: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3441312/2017-01-31-Commonwealths-Brief-ISO-Motion-to.pdf … / A hearing was set today for 10a Friday on this motion.
2 replies 10 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Yes, Virginia tonight followed that up with a motion to show cause why the feds shouldn't be held in contempt: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3441313/2017-02-01-Virginia-s-Motion-for-a-Rule-to-Show.pdf …
1 reply 9 retweets 16 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Breaking: Plaintiffs AND Defendants in Aziz v. Trump have since filed a Joint Request to Hold Claims in Abeyance: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3441311/Aziz-Joint-Motion-Abeyance.pdf …pic.twitter.com/y3pb1aP8QD
4 replies 26 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
In other words, the gov't got the plaintiffs in this case to agree to work out settling the claims ... likely hoping to avoid VA's entrance.
4 replies 8 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Weren't there John Does in that case? Are they included?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It doesn't appear to exclude them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.