But in the Massachusetts decision there was, no? Was that definitely limited to Logan?
-
-
-
That's on arrival side; I'm not clear that has an impact on departure side.
-
Hmm. My impression was airlines should treat embarking passengers as if they would not be detained. https://aclum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/6-TRO-Jan-29-2017.pdf …
-
I have the order, thanks. Again, I'm not sure what authority the judges in MA have over CDG departures, for example.
-
I'm not suggesting they would be able to force Air France to allow someone to board...
-
Rather, that BOS would have to tell Air France that, just on the basis of the EO, the passenger need not be turned away at CDG
-
At dinner, but I'll think about it.
-
Cool. Bon appétit!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
then why are people still being detained and shipped off to black sites without representation?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So stopping people from boarding. Getting them on the outbound side.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BuzzFeedNews Notice to Buzz Crap never had anything of great negative consequence during BHO last 8years?I guess he's perfectThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
do you envision a court case will come up for temporary stay on the travel side of things too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.