I'd say that's a dangerously optimistic reading of today's order, and potentially very harmful.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
it might not be the way things shake out ultimately, depending on regs issued pursuant to this order. But for the moment yes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLind
No. Visitors to those countries are also implicated. Read (12)(A)(i).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
So your reading is that "aliens from" these countries, in the EO, is the same as "visitors to" same countries in the statute?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DLind
The fact it just says (a)(12) and nothing more in the order leaves ambiguity as to the definition of "from," yes.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @DLind
AdotSad Retweeted T. Greg Doucette
AdotSad added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's a different issue than what we're talking about here.
10:50 PM - 27 Jan 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.