it might not be the way things shake out ultimately, depending on regs issued pursuant to this order. But for the moment yes.
-
-
-
No. Visitors to those countries are also implicated. Read (12)(A)(i).
-
So your reading is that "aliens from" these countries, in the EO, is the same as "visitors to" same countries in the statute?
-
The fact it just says (a)(12) and nothing more in the order leaves ambiguity as to the definition of "from," yes.
-
There's enough ambiguity there that I am very uncomfortable saying (12)(A)(i) folks are definitely not included under the EO.
-
Additionally, under (12)(D), the DHS secretary could change his list, which would change this list.
-
So do you think it's equally foolhardy to tell ANY foreign national it's safe to leave/reenter US?
-
I think it's irresponsible of a journalist to ALL CAPS claim that someone is definitely safe to travel, when you do not know that.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're ignoring half of the relevant provision. Read (12)(A)(i).pic.twitter.com/LKHyqrR3GI
-
Does this Executive Order persecute those who practice religions different from the President's own? Because:pic.twitter.com/Hw2BtDWsti
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.