This is the only substantive difference ~against~ a courtesy fifth here where Chief Justice Roberts gave one in an Alabama case on Nov. 3.https://twitter.com/davidlnoll/status/807038307960057856 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @RMFifthCircuit
It's at least possible that the Justices have also discussed likelihood of cert. since last month.
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WilliamBaude @RMFifthCircuit
They have not formally discussed it yet. It keeps being rescheduled before conference. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/16-602.htm …pic.twitter.com/bRh9EM2ksO
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Or a big hint on top of a big hint that someone's writing a ferocious dissent from denial?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I mean, normally that comes when they keep re-listing. Not when they reschedule ~prior to~ conf.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, but just trying to find some thread of connection
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq @chrisgeidner and
Waiting to decide the 4 similar Alabama petitions at same time?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @judahariel and
They could've re-listed to do so. Instead, w Arthur, they rescheduled ahead of time.
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.