This is the only substantive difference ~against~ a courtesy fifth here where Chief Justice Roberts gave one in an Alabama case on Nov. 3.https://twitter.com/davidlnoll/status/807038307960057856 …
-
-
But, yes, I suppose they could have discussed it informally since then.
-
surely at least some discussion is already necessary to keep rescheduling ...
-
We'll know for sure next week if they deny cert.
-
Well, not really. There will be not necessarily be any explanation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or a big hint on top of a big hint that someone's writing a ferocious dissent from denial?
-
I mean, normally that comes when they keep re-listing. Not when they reschedule ~prior to~ conf.
-
Yeah, but just trying to find some thread of connection
-
Waiting to decide the 4 similar Alabama petitions at same time?
-
But, then why not hold this?
-
They could've re-listed to do so. Instead, w Arthur, they rescheduled ahead of time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.