Are there times it's appropriate to allow an official to say what they want? Yes. It gets them on the record and allows follow-up reporting.
-
-
-
I was sorta giving Wolff the benefit of the doubt that that was how he was seeing that day in Trump Tower, but now it appears not. Too bad.
-
Wolff: "For the moment, the proper response is to stand back, neither approve and disapprove, and wait and see."
-
He slips in the "approve and disapprove" to create this ~bias~ idea, but the problem with this is the rest of the sentence.
-
Look: "For the moment, the proper response is to stand back ... and wait and see." I don't know what that is, but it's not a journalist.
-
are you an impartial journalist?
-
Do I have independent views and assessments? Yes. Is my work biased? I don't think so. Is it fair? I think it is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sure, report what they said accurately. But there is a difference b/w journo & water carrier. Next step down is spokesperson.
-
Not sure I understand the "but" in your tweet. That is exactly the point I am making ... ? Hence: "Trash."
-
It wasn't directed at your statement. I'd gone back and read everyone's, and the "but" was swirling in my head (so to speak).
-
Got it. Cool.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
HOT TAKE: Wolff is garbage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ggreenwald Since when has he kept himself out of his writing!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.