As @rickhasen noted, there is some sloppiness in the order itself, appeal could be an attempt to quickly clean it up. (Could be. We'll see.)
-
-
-
Here's
@rickhasen on what he sees as sloppiness in the Ohio TRO: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88761 (I think he's right that it could be more clean.) -
My
@BuzzFeedNews report on a series of rulings today affecting voting in Arizona, North Carolina, and Ohio —>https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/rulings-in-three-election-related-challenges-favor-democrats?utm_term=.tuVgOrDnlQ#.ybLxoPrYBz … -
JUST IN: Federal Court Backs Protections For Gay Worker Under Existing Law —> https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-court-backs-protections-for-gay-worker-under-existin?utm_term=.vqO6lkZPVO …pic.twitter.com/HrmqbcWvXm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here is Trump campaign's appeal in Ohio voter intimidation lawsuit. They say the order violates the First Amendment:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/rulings-in-three-election-related-challenges-favor-democrats?utm_term=.yx6P8N4RjO#.jn8oeWjLm7 …
-
FYI: The Trump campaign's appeal in the Ohio voter intimidation case has been docketed at the 6th Circuit. It is Docket # 16-4268.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What exactly are they seeking to be able to do?
-
I continued explaining more, but it's gotten hidden in the thread:https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/794665776724738049 …
-
We won't know ~exactly~ what they're arguing until they file the appeal itself. That was just the notice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#ff@chrisgeidner for what's going to be an intense legal weekend - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
thanks for all the hard long hours you're gonna have over the next few days.
-
hmm, this reads like a blessing/curse thing ... but thanks ;-)
-
trying to be appreciative of what you are doing and that it's a crunch time for you.
-
I knowwww. I'm just teasing: It was v nice — but also foreboding! ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
His argument being that he should be free to intimidate voters?
-
Preventing him from intimidating voters violates his right to be POTUS. Pesky voters. Can't woo 'em, suppress 'em!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They want to be able to ... intimidate?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.