I'm still expecting Garland confirmation in lame duck if Dems will be retaking Senate.https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/790565331102232577 …
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Interesting; you don't think the left will have a "we can do better" view, let's wait until 2017?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
.
@DavidLat Here's why I think@EdWhelanEPPC is wrong and Judge Garland gets confirmed in lame duck IF Democrats take Senate /15 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
First, Obama will be loyal to Garland and not withdraw nomination and Garland won't withdraw unless Clinton asks. Clinton won't ask /2
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
despite pressure from the left to withdraw Garland for younger and more liberal candidate. Getting Garland out of way during lame duck /3
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
You don't think Senate D's will kill it? Parting gift from Reid?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @elkmovie
Why is it a gift? Instead of a settled nomination, HRC's inbox on Day One will be finding a vetting a new nominee/1
@elkmovie@rickhasen3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
Confirmation would be a parting gift to HRC/3
@elkmovie@rickhasen2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I agree with Rick ~and~ Garrett here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.