OK, so we're doing this ...https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/786421991997902848 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That's from the standard under NYT v. Sullivan to recover for libel of a public figure. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/376/254 …pic.twitter.com/rRkDdVWTU4
tl;dr: I don't think I've seen such an unthreatening threat letter in some time.
looks like they’re trying to look tough to their dumbest supporters, probably including the candidate.
Key word "trying"
And yet, they are basing that on the fact the women waited so long to come forward. That's WEAK. Especially in light of him
NYT confirmed the stories by speaking with corroborating witnesses. What more could they have done?
damage 2 reputation element is voided by his defense re tapes: Bragged abt assaults I didn't commit! Actual malice aside...
They are just trying to deflect attention from what Trump did to speculation about lawsuit. It's working.
truth is still an absolute defense. The nine other women who came forward today suggest NYT lawyers aren't too worried.
being on tape, bragging about groping and kissing women without consent.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.