Just worth mentioning--the NYT story is that Trump *could have* used '95 losses to pay no taxes for 20 years. Not that he did.
I just got out of a movie; I swear I didn't see the tweet was an hour old!
-
-
Not directed to you two, just a tweet I didn't expect to go semi-viral.
-
I know you love us!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Main point--odd that folks would see this as an indictment when the assumption is "of course anyone would do this."
-
Adultery? Pot, meet kettle. Taking advantage of a rigged system? Oh, look here.
-
But he always says "yeah I was corrupt for me but now I'll be corrupt for you." It's a neat logical box.
-
"I know the tax system." Yeah, that's still his response tonight. But, when you hide something, revealing part of ...
-
... it that shows that a person potentially has political reasons (any of a #) for hiding it is powerful, imho.
-
Good point, like Nixon said it's the lie that gets you.
-
Also--FWIW--I view that this was in '95 as prima facie evidence that IRS must have OKed it at some point.
-
Tho I don't know enough about personal taxes, maybe it was settled somehow w/no publicity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.