-
-
The "journalism" when it goes from him attacking trans people to the author raising whether Milo would have been on the left in past is


-
I wanted to point all that out bc there's this false idea being put forth by Out that this was ~journalism~! And their ~responsibility~!
-
And everyone, including me, has been pointing out the glam photo shoot was unnecessary in that scenario.
-
But, more than that, the piece is written at several points like a love letter to Milo. Yes, you can allow a profile subject to speak ...
-
... & that includes allowing controversial profile subjects to speak. But, this went further. Much of what I pointed out in the above ...
-
... excerpts come solely and wholly from the writer and his vantage-point — and those are some of the most fawning parts of the piece.
-
Alright, so it's all together, here are my two earlier threads on this: 1) https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/778629281270358016 … 2)https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/778644836543033344 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
drag them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it was a puff piece. An embarrassingly bad puff piece.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.