Law review editors reject empirical article because findings dont align with their conceived need for social change http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2016/09/furthering-social-change.html …
Replying to @jadler1969
@gabrielmalor Oh, come on. Name names, or this is worthless.
12:35 PM - 9 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.