Following up on DOJ's filing last night about related case in the trans case out of Texas (report: https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/will-feds-keep-protecting-transgender-workers-in-wake-of-cou … ), today ...
-
-
While a bit odd, the timeline doesn't seem irrational given how long DOJ took in responding to O'Connor's injunction in the first place.
-
the injunction- or judgement was reached quickly b/c school was starting. Why the big rush to move forward now?
-
Not sure I understand your question. Obviously, if you want your policy in place, you don't like the injunction and want it gone.
-
I guess I'm not sure who's antsy to get going on this. DOJ or Texas. I check to your understanding...
-
Well, no one is, and I actually question why that is so. The injunction is now in place; admin should, I'd think, be unhappy.
-
A federal judge has ordered them—10 days ago—to halt policy enforcement nationwide. Now, specifically ~because~ school started...
-
...I would think Justice/Ed would want to show that it believes every day of this injunction is a bad thing by moving quickly.
-
Instead, we've got only this:pic.twitter.com/gDkIOgj72c
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's already an immigrant-led protest outside the courthouse: https://www.facebook.com/daniellamarrero94/videos/1079514228763952/ …
-
Different case, different court.
-
Lol. Read "Texas case" and ran with it. Litigious cowboys smh
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.