Full decision: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3001284/4th-Circuit-NC-NAACP-v-McCrory.pdf …pic.twitter.com/3j4WwCHiYs
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
My breaking report on the 4th Circuit's NC voting law decision:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-appeals-court-north-carolina-tried-to-make-it-harder?utm_term=.tiJqoYmpK3#.bpEj9352yl …
The 4th Circuit addresses the "race as a proxy for party" question as such:pic.twitter.com/VHaChVSV5k
In holding the discriminatory intent finding of the dist ct clearly erroneous, the 4th Circuit does not mince words:pic.twitter.com/04SfwuPMQ8
Shorter Motz to the district court: What were you thinking?pic.twitter.com/yyZm58eyXp
What the North Carolina legislature did as soon as preclearance was gone after Shelby County:pic.twitter.com/1YFoL58m8m
4th Circuit explaining why, unlike the 5th Circuit, it is not remanding the NC case:pic.twitter.com/qFVaOylXL9
4th Circuit, on how this is different from Crawford (with a Romer cite!):pic.twitter.com/8nW3ZL3Zne
FULL REPORT: Federal Appeals Court: N.C. Tried To Make It Harder For Black People To Vote —> https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-appeals-court-north-carolina-tried-to-make-it-harder?utm_term=.gemNjWKRXm#.hvg1r7NLxA … via @BuzzFeedNews
A follow-up look at where the 4th Circuit decision detailed how lawmakers decided what voting changes to make:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/why-a-federal-court-found-discriminatory-intent-behind-north?utm_term=.cwyPV8lq0A …
@MattMcGorry FYI: Here's my report on that North Carolina voting rights decision —>https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/federal-appeals-court-north-carolina-tried-to-make-it-harder?utm_term=.br88Rp8mP#.axO76z7Wb …
you don't have a constitutional right to a particular mode of transportation. You do have a constitutional right to vote.
except that, objectively, that isn't an actual problem.
definitely not on food stamps or medicaid, but nice ad hominem attack. As I've said, this is about defending a civil right.
If you can provide objective data that shows voter fraud to be a problem then I'm down to read it.
Additionally, if you'd like to make a rational argument and have a discussion, I'm cool with that too.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.