Important to note that both Michigan & Ohio AGs joined this second multi-state lawsuit against pro-trans policies:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/nebraska-leads-10-states-in-lawsuit-against-obama-pro-transg?utm_term=.foVJjAzRB …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
wondering if the NC suit the US filed earlier at least slows the TX trick of asking for a national injunction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LindaHirshman1
There's no rationale, IMO, for a nationwide injunction — unlike immig, where they argues nationwide policy is key.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @LindaHirshman1
Even outside of the DOJ suit in NC, but, certainly the DOJ suit and today's filing makes it seem a nationwide injunction ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @LindaHirshman1
... would be a no-go. But, a Texas federal judge gets to be a Texas federal judge, so who knows!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
1/ trans lawsuit argues that nationwide federal "guidance" to schools is key. I just don't see how to get out of it that way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LindaHirshman1
Right, no. The guidance comes from the feds, but there is nothing about the policy that requires that there be a uniform ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @LindaHirshman1
... policy. If you look in the challenge to the immigration action, the only reason why the nationwide injunction was ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
... allowed was because, fundamentally, immigration policy needs to be uniform. No such thing going on here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.