I love that Trump talks about appointing judges as part of his "first 100 days," like that is something that just, ta-da, happens.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
with all the vacancies held over and a continued Republican Senate majority, it is something that just, ta-da, can happen.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
In any event, I think you're totally wrong. I put the "first 100 days" in quotes bc he said that, and bc that is absurd.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Why? Lots of federal court vacancies. Trump noms on Day 1. R-controlled Senate nukes filibuster. Confirmed by day 100.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
You're smarter than this and I'm not wasting my time on how obviously and incredibly wrong this is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
I think the obvious "let us be good to one another" response would've been "blue slips. vetting. nuke-shy." Come on, Chris.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
OK, Mike. Again, you knew all of that, so my question to you is, "Explain your tweets."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
further breakdown in norms post-Garland weakens blue slip, nuke defenses. Avg.
#SCOTUS non-conf is 67 days.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think we disagree about this, and I'm just going to leave it there. Have a great day!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.