"[N]o one can breathe in this atmosphere," NYC native Sotomayor writes, echoing the "I Can't Breathe" protests after Eric Garner's death.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Kagan, joined by Ginsburg, dissenting, is not much more restrained — though written differently:pic.twitter.com/WdW55kK6t9
1 reply 29 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Then Kagan goes all tort-law-dork and I love it!pic.twitter.com/dYcTPqtHZt
3 replies 14 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Kagan, joined by RBG, concludes majority "practically invites" unconstitutional stops w/ post-stop warrant checks.pic.twitter.com/fvJyTXZC14
1 reply 37 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Most interesting thing going on in Strieff is Breyer. Remember that next time y'all yell at me when I question how we characterize him!
3 replies 6 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
OK, second-most interesting thing. Sotomayor's Part IV is the most interesting thing.
3 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Gotta be a lot of criminal defense lawyers out there wondering if Strieff only would have gotten worse for them if Garland had a vote.
2 replies 12 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
worse how? Garland really much if any worse than Breyer (swing vote here) in this area?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JoePaulson2
First: 6-3 is worse than 5-3. Second: We don't know. And, if he is, then Breyer's vote wouldn't even be needed.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
[1] kinda but a loss is a loss [2] so the question remains. on this specific issue, not sure how much it matters but yeah
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.