If you think Anderson Cooper's interview with Pam Bondi was "TERRIFYING," you must live a #blessed life of privilege.
-
-
FYI, from the motion to dismiss, here is Bondi's "harm" argument that Cooper referenced: https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/050_state_officials_mot_to_dismiss_and_memo_in_opp_to_pi_mots_-_2014-05-12.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Rc1G6gskaX
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
is the argument here basically that Bondi should have refused to defend Florida’s ban?
-
bc attacking lawyers for representing their clients (i.e. being lawyers), underlying merits notwithstanding, seems… ehhhh
-
No, Sergio, it's not.
-
So what was the point here? Her and her office’s rhetoric and legal arguments are fair game for criticism…
-
but it felt to me like he was going after her for defending the ban, period, rather than how she did it
-
No, and I think my thread and his interview make that abundantly clear.
-
eh, that interview felt more like trying to call her a hypocrite than sincerely interrogating if/why her rhetoric has changed
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Good stuff, Chris. Sincerely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.