If you think Anderson Cooper's interview with Pam Bondi was "TERRIFYING," you must live a #blessed life of privilege.
-
-
He pushed back by pointing to her defense of the state's marriage ban. That's it, he didn't equate that fight with murder. Not at all.
-
In Florida's merits brief at the 11th Circuit, filed a few days earlier, Bondi cited all the way back to '70s cases:pic.twitter.com/zK0NsF33PD
-
1974's Singer v. Hara: "[T]here is no 'wife' and therefore there can be no marriage."pic.twitter.com/CSYFgrX2gl
-
That case was cited to by Pam Bondi in 2014.
-
People's views and attitudes can and do change, but it is important for journalists to question the motives for politicians' doing so.
-
Obama and Clinton have been questioned repeatedly and extensively over their changed views, as have other Dems. No reason Bondi is exempt.
-
Both Clintons, in fact!
-
FYI, from the motion to dismiss, here is Bondi's "harm" argument that Cooper referenced: https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/050_state_officials_mot_to_dismiss_and_memo_in_opp_to_pi_mots_-_2014-05-12.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Rc1G6gskaX
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.