This is trash. NYT cites, but does not link to Politico, who broke this story:http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/us/politics/obama-kalorama-washington-house.html …
-
-
Here's the
@politico story from this morning on where the Obamas are due to live in DC after the White House:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/where-obamas-live-dc-after-white-house-223557 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meh, it's not like they just aggregated like the WaPo is inclined to do these days. Looks like original reporting to confirm.
-
So? You can link. Otherwise, it's trash.
-
Like, they have other links in the story and they, by name, cite Politico as having broken the story. Totally unprofessional.
-
Sure. But a capital crime? No. Nobody owns the news, though it's possible to steal it. Here, it's not stolen.
-
lol. Trash.
-
Defending a publication citing someone breaking news but not linking to it as somehow acceptable practice in 2016 is incredible.
-
I bet it was even an oversight. Chris, your passion here is commendable.
-
Good night.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.