Someone on the legal team?
-
-
-
Replying to @tomgara
You know what? You're probably right it's Thiel. Note that Sorkin's new post never says Thiel declined to comment.
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
-
Replying to @tomgara @petersterne
also: they don't call it "confirmation" of the Forbes story, & go w single-sourcing, so it has to be him, I'd think
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
That said, it's VERY deceivingly described to readers.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @tomgara
Well yes, that's the whole point of him speaking on background — so people don't realize he's the source!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
But why did the Times allow him to do it? It's up there with "senior admin official" in pointlessness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't think it's pointless. It confirms & fleshes out the Forbes scoop, which some people doubted.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, since they're both unnamed, they could both be the same source!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.