NYT confirms the Thiel thing via "person briefed on the arrangement" which kinda has to be Thiel, right, unless...?http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/25/business/dealbook/peter-thiel-is-said-to-bankroll-hulk-hogans-suit-against-gawker.html …
-
-
But why did the Times allow him to do it? It's up there with "senior admin official" in pointlessness.
-
I don't think it's pointless. It confirms & fleshes out the Forbes scoop, which some people doubted.
-
Well, since they're both unnamed, they could both be the same source!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.